a12 bionic vs snapdragon 855

Hemoscomparado las características del Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus y el Apple A12 Bionic y hemos elaborado una lista de beneficios y una tabla comparativa para usted. Descubra cuál elegir en 2022. Beneficios de Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus. Ganador en 目高通骁龙 855 在CPU天梯排行榜中的综合得分是63，而苹果 A12 Bionic处理器的综合得分是69。. 通过对比两个CPU在AnTuTu和Geekbench等基准测试中跑分差异和基本参数信息，可以得出以下结论：. 高通 骁龙 855处理器的Geekbench 5单核跑分低0.71倍. 高通 骁龙 855处理器的 CPUReview & Comparison Specs & Benchmarks MediaTek Helio G96 vs . Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G - Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS). Exynos 9611 vs helio g88 Hızlıbir hafıza (RAM) sonucu çok fazla etkileyecektir. Tek çekirdekli test, sadece bir CPU çekirdeği kullanır, çekirdek veya hyperthreading yeteneği sayılmaz. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. 8C 8T @ 2.84 GHz. 724 (65%) Apple A12 Bionic. 6C 6T @ 2.49 GHz. Diğerbağlantı özellikleri bakımından da oldukça güçlü olan Snapdragon 855; 10 Gbps'e kadar Wi-Fi hızı, X24 LTE modemiyle 2 Gbps Cat.20 LTE hızı ve 316 Mbps'e kadar upload hızı sunabiliyor. Apple A12 Bionic: Apple'ın A12 Bionic yonga seti, bağlanabilirlik konusunda rakiplerinin oldukça gerisinde kalıyor. Dalamhal kinerja, keduanya hampir setara, dengan A12 Bionic memimpin dalam kinerja inti tunggal. Tetapi ketika datang ke chip yang siap untuk masa depan, 855 Snapdragon berjuang keras untuk memimpin. Mudah-mudahan, chipset Apple generasi berikutnya, Snapdragon 855, akan menjembatani kesenjangan tersebut. Cpu基准规格和测试 Apple A12 Bionic vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 - Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) CPUComparison Specs & Benchmarks Apple A12 Bionic vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 - Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. Thisperformance comparison involves two processors: A12 Bionic is gexa-core (Vortex) and Snapdragon 855 Plus is octa-core (Kryo 485). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. GeekBench5 Benchmark-score voor A12 Bionic versus Snapdragon 855 Plus en A12 versus Snapdragon 780G. In single core scoorde A12 Bionic 1106 punten en Snapdragon 780G slaagde erin 795 te scoren, wat 39% lager is dan A13. Ondertussen scoorde de Snapdragon 855+ nog lager met 783 punten, 41% lager dan A13 Bionic.In multi-core scoorde A12 Bionic . VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Adreno 640 with the older 6-core Apple A11 Bionic Apple GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Performs better in floating-point computationsHas a smaller size transistor 7 versus 10 nmAnnounced 1-year and 3-months laterHas 2 more coresShows better up to 31% AnTuTu 9 score – 522K vs 399K19% higher CPU clock speed 2840 vs 2390 MHzBetter instruction set architecture Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 141555 126597 GPU 184296 122199 Memory 62560 65581 UX 131223 84287 Total score 522806 399113 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection 21 images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning 48 images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s 21 images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 91% 62% Graphics test 18 FPS 18 FPS Score 3096 3146 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 58 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 56 FPS [Ultra] - Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] - Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS [Ultra] - World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 57 FPS [Ultra] - Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 1080 x 2340 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and A11 Bionic CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver 2x GHz – Monsoon4x GHz – Mistral Cores 8 6 Frequency 2840 MHz 2390 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 512 KB 64 KB L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB L3 cache 2 MB - Process 7 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 6 W 8 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 640 Apple GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 585 MHz - Execution units 2 3 Shading units 384 - FLOPS 899 Gigaflops 325 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 16 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 690 Apple M10 Storage type UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2436 x 1125 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G - 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 12 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 523 Total votes 836 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A11 Bionic and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ Apple A12X BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 855Why is Apple A12X Bionic better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 855?3300million more transistors?10000 millionvs6700 millionWhy is Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 better than Apple A12X Bionic?Uses HMP?Has 5G support?User reviewsOverall ratingApple A12X Bionic0 User reviewsApple A12X BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 8558 User reviewsQualcomm Snapdragon 855FeaturesGeneral infoA 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its clock speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicThe graphics processing unit GPU has a higher clock version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicDirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better fifth-generation wireless technology delivers higher speeds and lower latency than the previous, fourth-generation turbo Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicWhen the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicSome apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit GPU for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better speed1 x & 3 x & 4 x CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores processing units. It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of threads Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicMore threads result in faster performance and better technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to increase performance, whereas checking email will use the less powerful cores to maximize battery Multi-Processing HMP is a more advanced version of technology. In this setup, a processor can utilize all cores at the same time, or just a single core for low-intensity tasks. This can provide powerful performance or increased battery life clock speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased cache Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide cache Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide multiplier Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855The clock multiplier controls the speed of the cache Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicIt can support faster memory, which will give quicker system Double Data Rate memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more maximum amount of memory RAM is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into channels Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicMore memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a system on a chip SoC has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicThe download speed is a measurement of the internet connection bandwidth, representing the maximum data transfer rate at which a device can access online speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X BionicThe upload speed is a measurement of the internet connection bandwidth, representing the maximum data transfer rate at which a device can send information to a server or another technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management DRM.Multithreading technology such as Intel's Hyperthreading or AMD's Simultaneous Multithreading provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor's physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at bit helps protect the computer from malicious executed at a time Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to is used to speed up encryption and version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Vector Floating-Point VFP is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's single-core performance. Source Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's multi-core performance. Source Primate Labs, 2023PassMark result Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple result single Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single result overclocked Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A12X Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU when it is is a wireless technology standard that allows data transfers between devices placed in close proximity, using short-wavelength, ultra-high frequency radio waves. Newer versions provide faster data Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Show allThis page is currently only available in English. Qualcomm’s latest flagship mobile processor is the first 5G ready mobile chipset. Apart from that, the Snapdragon 855 carries new Kryo CPU cores, a power efficient 7nm fabrication process, and an upgraded X24 LTE modem. We don’t have to wait for long since the new Samsung Galaxy S10 is one of the flagships to house matter how much we try, we can’t help but compare the Snapdragon 855 chipset with Apple A12 Bionic in the iPhones. The slightly older A12 Bionic processor powers most of the 2018 iPhones, including the iPhone XR and the iPhone XS. The A12 Bionic is one of the first mobile processors to be manufactured using the 7nm fabrication process. It delivers a faster graphics performance and an enhanced Neural we’re comparing these two top-tier processors of 2019 at least for now to chart out their similarities as well as dive into the That MatterPropertyApple A12 BionicSnapdragon 855PropertyApple A12 BionicSnapdragon 855Design Process7nm7nmArchitecture64-bit64-bitCPU6-core processor 2x Performance cores + 4x Efficiency cores8 x Kryo 485 CPUs clocked up to GHzGPUApple-designed 4-core GPUAdreno 640CameraApple’s ISPDual 14-bit CV-ISPs, Spectra 380 ISPChargingWireless charging, Normal Charging via USBQualcomm Quick Charge 4+Performance ImprovementsThe A12 Bionic and the Snapdragon 855 processors are based on the 64-bit microarchitecture and manufactured through the 7nm fabrication process. A smaller process node boosts the overall performance and the power efficiency of the chipset. Well, that’s the only similarity between both the A12 Bionic adopts a six-core CPU configuration — two Performance cores and four Efficiency A12 Bionic only brings a relative bump in performance and not too significant one when compared to the A11 Bionic. So you’ll notice that the app launches are a bit faster owing to the smart compute system. Also, A12 Bionic is more power efficient and consumes less the 6-core CPU implementation of the A12, the Snapdragon 855 has 8-core configuration. Qualcomm has opted for a tri-cluster arrangement, instead of the regular two cluster Snapdragon 855 sports eight Kryo 845 cores clustered across a single Prime’ Cortex A76 core clocked at GHz, three Performance’ Cortex-A76 cores clocked at GHz and lastly four Efficiency’ Cortex-A55 cores clocked at GHz. These clusters are designed for high performance, high efficiency, improved task-sharing capacities and low latency addition to that, the Snapdragon 855’s Prime core has a 512KB L2 cache and is coupled with performance core’s 256KB L2 caches and the efficiency core’s 128KB L2 cache. These L2 Caches work together to push the information way quickly and without any interruptions by acting as a bridge between the processor and the the GPU front, the Snapdragon 855 bundles the Adreno 640 GPU which offers a 20 percent boost in gaming graphics and can handle 4K HDR10+ playback. That’s what Qualcomm TestsWell, the benchmark scores may not accurately translate to the real world experience. But at the end of the day, these scores help portray the potential of a chip in numbers. Hence, a peek into the benchmark scores helps gauge the true prowess of a A12 Bionic-Powered iPhone XRAs per the folks at Tom’s Guide, the Snapdragon 855 scored 3,552 single-core points and 11,196 multi-core points on Geekbench 4 benchmark tests. On the other hand, the Apple iPhone XS powered by the A12 Bionic clocked 4,701 single-core and 11,420 multi-core in multi-core on the same benchmark difference is quite slim in multi-core tests but is significant differences in single-core BionicSnapdragon 855PropertyA12 BionicSnapdragon 855Single-core Geekbench 4 Score4,7013,552Multi-core Geekbench 4 Score11,42011,196Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence or AI plays an integral part in the chipsets of 2018-19. When it comes to the Snapdragon 855, it bundles a 4th generation multi-core AI Engine to power the AI-related tasks. It’s worth noting that this engine is a combination of the Hexagon 690 processor, the Kyro CPU, and the Adreno GPU. If we talk numbers, it’s capable of handling up to 7 trillion AI operations per Snapdragon 855’s Hexagon 690 DSP is upgraded to handle more complex AI tasks. And combined with a dedicated tensor accelerator, the DSP gives the chipset a threefold gain in machine learning the many advantages of this AI engine, a few notable ones include scene detection, super resolutions in snapshots, face authentication, dual and single-camera bokeh, and text new chipset also supports AI frameworks like Google’s TensorFlow, Facebook’s Caffe 2, and the Open Neural Network Exchange ONNX.As opposed to Qualcomm’s 4-core AI engine, Apple bundles an 8-core Neural Engine in its A12 Bionic processor. And it can perform a whopping 5 trillion AI operations per from tasks like face detection or making predictions based on your actions, the key task of this processor is resource allocation which we mentioned above. It smartly computes where to run algorithms on the GPU, the processor or in the neural engine. At the same time, it can even direct additional processing power where there are improvements like faster app launches, learning user habits, and real-time machine learning power. Apple claims that it can run Core ML nine times faster, while at the same time using only a small portion of the resources and battery Shutter GameToday, camera tech and AI walk hand-in-hand. That’s because cameras are now tapping into the power of the AI engine for producing images which are rich in details and are crisp as well as shot captured through the iPhone XRIn the case of the A12 Bionic processor, the neural engine helps to analyze shots in real-time and makes the changes accordingly. Plus, the enhanced ISP brings home minute details to photos. Along with that, the Smart HDR brings in quality dynamic the other hand, the Snapdragon 855 features the in-house Spectra 380 Image Signal Processor. Qualcomm claims that it is the world’s first AI-integrated Snapdragon 855-powered Galaxy S10 PlusThis gives the chip a gain when it comes to hardware depth sensing, object segmentation and object classification in real-time. For instance, your phone will be able to easily replace video or photo backgrounds in real time, among other Battle Cry Gets LouderApart from the key differences above, the Snapdragon 855’s main advantage is that it is 5G ready and one of the most noticeable upgrades will be the bump in speed. It also features the Snapdragon X24 LTE that can enable download speed up to 2Gbps and upload speed up to 316 Mbps. Plus, it also features the new Elite gaming mode to improve the overall gaming it comes to the performance, both are almost at par, with the A12 Bionic taking the lead in single core performance. But when it comes to being a future-ready chipset, the 855 fights hard for the top spot. Hopefully, the next generation Apple chipsets will challenge the Snapdragon 855 and bridge the up Intrigued by the new Samsung Exynos 9820 processor in the Galaxy S10 and S10 Plus? Read about the chipset’s features in detail from the link below. VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus Adreno 640 with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic Apple A12 Bionic GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments 1 Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus Performs 85% better in floating-point computationsHas 2 more coresAnnounced 10-months later19% higher CPU clock speed 2960 vs 2490 MHzShows better up to 5% AnTuTu 9 score – 558K vs 531K Pros of Apple A12 Bionic Higher GPU frequency ~67%Better instruction set architecture Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 145705 127267 GPU 205460 196436 Memory 92875 99161 UX 111507 104297 Total score 558102 531765 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection 23 images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s 745 Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 97% 69% Graphics test 14 FPS 31 FPS Score 2364 5218 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 39 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 58 FPS [Ultra] - Fortnite 29 FPS [Medium] - Shadowgun Legends 53 FPS [Ultra] - World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] - Genshin Impact 39 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 58 FPS [Ultra] - Device Realme X3 Superzoom 1080 x 2400 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 Plus and A12 Bionic CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver 2x GHz – Vortex4x GHz – Tempest Cores 8 6 Frequency 2960 MHz 2490 MHz Instruction set L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB L3 cache 2 MB - Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 6 W 6 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 640 Apple A12 Bionic GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 675 MHz 1125 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 384 - FLOPS 1037 Gigaflops 560 Gigaflops Vulkan version - OpenCL version - DirectX version 12 - Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 16 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 690 Neural Engine Storage type UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAC‑LC, Apple Lossless, HE‑AAC, Linear PCM, AAX и AAX+, HE‑AAC v2, MP3 Connectivity Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G Intel XMM 7560 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 Plus 772 48% Total votes 1610 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 855 Plus, or ask any questions Some TECH Guy 04 March 2021 1656 Yeah, paying +600 usd for a restrictive OS, planned obsolence, no freedom, terrible battery and overpriced device from a scummy company, sounds like a great deal +50 Reply Good one 07 March 2021 1245 You must be one of those people, who only read these spec sheets and don't do any further research. Have you also thought about refurbished phones? I am an Snapdragon 855+ user, but still your statement is quite nothing. +228 Reply Bad one 14 August 2021 1511 Good one, You mean those refurbished phone that either comes at almost original price or those with cracked screen and 30min battery capacity... Specially considering that iphone repairing at their store cost around the amount of an pretty good cheaper midrange phone +6 Reply Yes 25 August 2021 0303 Yes it’s definitely a great deal. With an Iphone, i won’t have to worry about updating or somethings like that. Android? Nah, after 1-2 years released, they will not care about yours device. +5 Reply Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Apple A12 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 855 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The higher Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units ALUs than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power TDP of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around W under load. Apple A12 Bionic ► remove from comparisonThe Apple A12 Bionic is a System on a Chip SoC from Apple that is found in the iPhone Xs and Xr. It was announced late 2018 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores and four power efficiency cores. Compared to the previous A11 Bionic, the A12 should offer a 15% improved CPU performance for the performance cores and a 50% lower power consumption for the efficiency cores both according to Apple. The chip also includes a new GPU that is advertised as 50% faster, the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second. With billion transistors, the A12 Bionic is a big chip especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 3 Billion or a Skylake desktop quad-core Soc Billion. Compared to the A11, the A12 integrates 60% more Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 20636 avg 32923 median 31198 26% max 45072 Points min 27400 avg 27548 median 27547 23% max 27717 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1934 avg 3937 median 4112 52% max 5024 Points min 2723 avg 3064 median 3056 38% max 3347 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2345 avg 3892 median 58% max 4703 Points min 2880 avg 3129 median 2961 42% max 3493 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 552 avg 713 median 744 32% max 751 Points min 1116 avg 1118 median 48% max 1119 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2164 avg 2622 median 2694 9% max 2856 Points min 2772 avg 2815 median 10% max 2857 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 725 avg 742 median 742 3% max 750 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2441 avg 2616 median 8% max 2852 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3406 avg 3480 median 3491 36% max 3537 Points min 4750 avg 4779 median 4774 49% max 4824 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10187 avg 10955 median 12% max 11388 Points min 11244 avg 11418 median 11480 13% max 11598 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3295 avg 3548 median 3548 51% max 3801 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10163 avg 10529 median 10529 26% max 10895 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1658 avg 1926 median 1926 16% max 2194 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 3919 avg 4247 median 4247 39% max 4575 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11986 avg 14903 median 29% max 17819 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5470 avg 6620 median 13% max 7769 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7059 avg 8575 median 22% max 10090 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 1852 avg 2147 median 2114 2% max 2611 ms min 603 avg 627 median 1% max 653 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 17011 avg 23240 median 23937 23% max 25640 Points min 41367 avg 42312 median 40% max 43280 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 90 avg median 25% max 129 Points min 155 avg median 37% max 166 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 239512 avg 255436 median 255924 87% max 268271 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 9188 avg 13484 median 13816 42% max 19329 Points min 7312 avg 9998 median 31% max 12409 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 53266 avg 73247 median 74726 92% max 79058 Points min 59570 avg 65177 median 66701 82% max 67735 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 67537 avg 152512 median 156467 49% max 191221 Points min 129473 avg 147840 median 151931 47% max 158023 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 85969 avg 115207 median 118475 73% max 127208 Points min 106600 avg 124761 median 127986 78% max 136472 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 217967 avg 354450 median 368232 65% max 398720 Points min 302955 avg 347775 median 358800 63% max 370545 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 51228 avg 63930 median 64229 54% max 72343 Points min 71574 avg 71607 median 60% max 71639 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 52596 avg 61638 median 59373 48% max 75544 Points min 45962 avg 56767 median 56767 46% max 67572 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 158097 avg 167704 median 167146 31% max 175532 Points min 166588 avg 170290 median 170290 31% max 173992 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 114777 avg 135173 median 139365 50% max 140166 Points min 98561 avg 122385 median 122385 44% max 146209 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 376698 avg 428445 median 432658 42% max 451559 Points min 411764 avg 421049 median 421048 41% max 430333 Points Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total ScoreAntutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPUPassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 197214 avg 236383 median 246456 32% max 265478 Points min 482773 avg 486852 median 486197 64% max 491585 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 5121 avg 6872 median 33% max 12391 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 5578 avg 11793 median 11067 24% max 18491 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 8342 avg 9710 median 9664 63% max 11440 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 10330 avg 12161 median 11890 59% max 14439 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 100% n=23Average Benchmarks Apple A12 Bionic → 112% n=23 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 13. 1445400 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10166 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 + ... 7 got single benchmarks 11011 + ... 8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10166 + ... 9 got single benchmarks 10166 + ... 10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 13 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 14 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 Geekbench 6 Single-CoreGeekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, based on the concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant 6 Multi-CoreGeekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, based on the concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark 5, 64bit Single-CoreGeekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't 5, 64bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of - FP32 Performance Single-precision GFLOPSThe theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy 32 bit in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per 8 BenchmarkThe AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX User Experience by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems. In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal results for PassMark CPU MarkSome of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty for Artificial Intelligence AI and Machine Learning MLProcessors with the support of artificial intelligence AI and machine learning ML can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number trillions of arithmetic operations per second TOPS. In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus vs Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus 855+ Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in 2019. Compared to the normal Snapdragon 855, the 855 Plus offers higher clock speeds of the GPU and CPU. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz up from GHz in the 855 and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. As the SD855, the 855+ integrates an Adreno 640 graphics card that is now higher clocked and should offer a 15% higher performance. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855+ at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. Apple A12 Bionic ► remove from comparisonThe Apple A12 Bionic is a System on a Chip SoC from Apple that is found in the iPhone Xs and Xr. It was announced late 2018 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores and four power efficiency cores. Compared to the previous A11 Bionic, the A12 should offer a 15% improved CPU performance for the performance cores and a 50% lower power consumption for the efficiency cores both according to Apple. The chip also includes a new GPU that is advertised as 50% faster, the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second. With billion transistors, the A12 Bionic is a big chip especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 3 Billion or a Skylake desktop quad-core Soc Billion. Compared to the A11, the A12 integrates 60% more Snapdragon 855 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The higher Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units ALUs than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power TDP of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around W under load. BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855+ ...Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus...Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 30069 avg 34737 median 32129 27% max 42240 Points min 27400 avg 27548 median 27547 23% max 27717 Points min 20636 avg 32923 median 31198 26% max 45072 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3137 avg 4371 median 4659 58% max 4737 Points min 2723 avg 3064 median 3056 38% max 3347 Points min 1934 avg 3937 median 4112 52% max 5024 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3143 avg 4323 median 65% max 4725 Points min 2880 avg 3129 median 2961 42% max 3493 Points min 2345 avg 3892 median 58% max 4703 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 738 avg 751 median 751 32% max 764 Points min 1116 avg 1118 median 48% max 1119 Points min 552 avg 713 median 744 32% max 751 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2652 avg 2659 median 9% max 2665 Points min 2772 avg 2815 median 10% max 2857 Points min 2164 avg 2622 median 2694 9% max 2856 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 761 avg 782 median 3% max 792 Points min 725 avg 742 median 742 3% max 750 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2519 avg 2788 median 9% max 2940 Points min 2441 avg 2616 median 8% max 2852 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3603 avg 3654 median 3654 38% max 3705 Points min 4750 avg 4779 median 4774 49% max 4824 Points min 3406 avg 3480 median 3491 36% max 3537 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 9705 avg 10547 median 12% max 11388 Points min 11244 avg 11418 median 11480 13% max 11598 Points min 10187 avg 10955 median 12% max 11388 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3295 avg 3548 median 3548 51% max 3801 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10163 avg 10529 median 10529 26% max 10895 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1658 avg 1926 median 1926 16% max 2194 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 3919 avg 4247 median 4247 39% max 4575 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11986 avg 14903 median 29% max 17819 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5470 avg 6620 median 13% max 7769 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7059 avg 8575 median 22% max 10090 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2007 avg 2054 median 2032 2% max 2134 ms min 603 avg 627 median 1% max 653 ms min 1852 avg 2147 median 2114 2% max 2611 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 23781 avg 24606 median 24571 23% max 25353 Points min 41367 avg 42312 median 40% max 43280 Points min 17011 avg 23240 median 23937 23% max 25640 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 89 avg median 98 23% max 111 Points min 155 avg median 37% max 166 Points min 90 avg median 25% max 129 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 239512 avg 255436 median 255924 87% max 268271 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 7312 avg 9998 median 31% max 12409 Points min 9188 avg 13484 median 13816 42% max 19329 Points min 59570 avg 65177 median 66701 82% max 67735 Points min 53266 avg 73247 median 74726 92% max 79058 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 129473 avg 147840 median 151931 47% max 158023 Points min 67537 avg 152512 median 156467 49% max 191221 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 106600 avg 124761 median 127986 78% max 136472 Points min 85969 avg 115207 median 118475 73% max 127208 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 302955 avg 347775 median 358800 63% max 370545 Points min 217967 avg 354450 median 368232 65% max 398720 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 66276 avg 72044 median 71855 60% max 78191 Points min 71574 avg 71607 median 60% max 71639 Points min 51228 avg 63930 median 64229 54% max 72343 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 64026 avg 80567 median 67% max 92659 Points min 45962 avg 56767 median 56767 46% max 67572 Points min 52596 avg 61638 median 59373 48% max 75544 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 169591 avg 184179 median 184036 34% max 199051 Points min 166588 avg 170290 median 170290 31% max 173992 Points min 158097 avg 167704 median 167146 31% max 175532 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 132673 avg 139174 median 139170 50% max 145684 Points min 98561 avg 122385 median 122385 44% max 146209 Points min 114777 avg 135173 median 139365 50% max 140166 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 462125 avg 478464 median 474972 46% max 501784 Points min 411764 avg 421049 median 421048 41% max 430333 Points min 376698 avg 428445 median 432658 42% max 451559 Points Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total ScoreAntutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPUPassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 237506 avg 249793 median 249792 33% max 262079 Points min 482773 avg 486852 median 486197 64% max 491585 Points min 197214 avg 236383 median 246456 32% max 265478 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 6325 avg 7543 median 7424 39% max 8880 Points min 5121 avg 6872 median 33% max 12391 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 13484 avg 15895 median 34% max 18305 Points min 5578 avg 11793 median 11067 24% max 18491 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 8702 avg 10315 median 68% max 11690 Points min 8342 avg 9710 median 9664 63% max 11440 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 10286 avg 13201 median 12786 64% max 15510 Points min 10330 avg 12161 median 11890 59% max 14439 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus → 100% n=23Average Benchmarks Apple A12 Bionic → 107% n=23Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 95% n=23 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 13. 1445400 checking url part for id 11491 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10166 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11491 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 11491 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10166 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 10166 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11011 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 17 return log +0s ... What is the difference between Apple A12 Bionic and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855? Should you buy phone having Apple A12 Bionic or should go for Qualcomm Snapdragon 855? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score AnTuTu and Geekbench, pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and A12 Bionic has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 407476 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 has AnTuTu score of 435219. Apple A12 Bionic comes up with 6 cores, 2490 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 has 8 cores and 2840 MHz frequency. Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both Bionic Vs Snapdragon 855SpecificationsA12 BionicSnapdragon 855Total score407476435219Frequency2490 MHz2840 MHzMax size12 GB16 GBMax display resolution2688 x 12423840 x 2160+ Read MoreCompare ChipsetsHide Common featuresAnTuTu Score CPU 129259142660GPU 148052172185Memory 5693456295UX 6301853180Total score 407476435219Chipset Mobile PhonesA12 BionicSnapdragon 855Connectivity Features 4G support LTE Cat. 18LTE Cat. 205G support NoYesDownload speed Up to 1000 MbpsUp to 2000 MbpsUpload speed Up to 150 MbpsUp to 316 MbpsWi-Fi 56Bluetooth Processor 2x GHz – Vortex4x GHz – Tempest1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 SilverCores 68Frequency 2490 MHz2840 MHzInstruction set cache 128 KB384 KBL2 cache 8 MB768 KBProcess 7 nanometers7 nanometersTransistor count billionTDP 6 W10 WGeekbench Score Image compression Mpixels/ Mpixels/sFace detection images/ images/sSpeech recognition words/ words/sMachine learning images/ images/sCamera shooting images/ images/sHTML 5 Mnodes/ Mnodes/sSQLite Krows/ Krows/sGraphics GPU name Apple A12 Bionic GPUAdreno 640Execution units 42FLOPS 560 Gigaflops899 GigaflopsVulkan version version version 1212Memory Info Memory type LPDDR4XLPDDR4XMemory frequency 2133 MHz2133 MHzBus 1x 64 Bit4x 16 BitMax bandwidth Gbit/ Gbit/sMax size 12 GB16 GBMultimedia Neural processor NPU YesHexagon 690Storage type NVMeUFS display resolution 2688 x 12423840 x 2160Max camera resolution 2x 12MP1x 192MP, 2x 22MPVideo capture 4K at 60FPS4K at 120FPSVideo playback 4K at 60FPS8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPSVideo codecs Motion VP8, VP9Audio codecs Protected AAC, AAC?LC, Apple Lossless, HE?AAC, Linear PCM, AAX ? AAX+, HE?AAC v2, MP3AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVBrowse Chipset ByPopular ChipsetUpcoming ChipsetWhich Chipset would you prefer?Similar ComparisonA12 BionicSnapdragon 855Popular MobilesUnder 10K10-20K20-40KAbove 40KDetailed Comparison of A12 Bionic vs Snapdragon 855Apple A12 Bionic has been announced on September 2018 whereas Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 has been announced on December 2018. Check out detailed comparison with key specs belowBenchmark Comparison A12 Bionic vs Snapdragon 855 Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. A12 Bionic has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 407476 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 129259, 148052, 56934, 63018 Comparison A12 Bionic vs Snapdragon 855CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. A12 Bionic comes up with the architecture of undefined and Snapdragon 855 comes up with architecture of Adreno 600. Former one has 6 core and 2490 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2840 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster Comparison A12 Bionic vs Snapdragon 855First chipset has max size of 12 GB and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 has max size of 12 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a and Connectivity Comparison A12 Bionic vs Snapdragon 855In terms of multimedia, A12 Bionic has Yes NPU with storage type as NVMe and Snapdragon 855 has Hexagon 690 NPU and UFS storage Which model has better AnTuTu score - A12 Bionic or Snapdragon 855?Snapdragon 855 has higher AnTuTu score at 435219 compare to A12 Bionic with total AnTuTu score at 407476 Which model has higher base frequency among A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 855?Snapdragon 855 has a higher base frequency of 2840 MHz compared to A12 Bionic with 2490 MHz base A12 Bionic vs Snapdragon 855, which model has higher bandwidth?Both Snapdragon 855 and A12 Bionic have same max bandwidth of Gbit/ Which model has higher number of cores - A12 Bionic or Snapdragon 855?Snapdragon 855 has 8 cores which is higher than A12 Bionic that has 6 cores.