a12 bionic vs snapdragon 855

QualcommSnapdragon 845 comes up with 8 cores, 2800 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 9611 has 8 cores and 2300 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 has Adreno 630 GPU and Adreno 600 architecture and latter Samsung Exynos 9611 comes up with Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and Bifrost architecture. Όσοναφορά τις επιδόσεις, είναι και οι δύο σχεδόν στο ίδιο επίπεδο, με το A12 Bionic να πρωτοπορεί σε απόδοση ενός πυρήνα. Αλλά όταν πρόκειται για ένα τσιπ έτοιμο για το μέλλον, ο 855 Snapdragon παλεύει Comparisonof the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A12 Bionic on one side and the Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.5GHz. AppleA12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. 返回首页. Apple A12 Bionic. Apple A12 Bionic与6内核和6 CPU线程一起运行。. 它在运行2.49 GHz基地2.49 GHz所有内核，而TDP设定在6 W 。. 处理器已连接到N/A CPU插槽。. 该版本--的L3高速缓存，支持1存储器通道以支持LPDDR4X-4266 RAM，并具有 PCIe Gen AppleA10 Fusion vs Apple A12 Bionic: 14. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855: 15. Apple A12 Bionic vs Apple A9X: 16. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Intel Core i7-2600K: 17. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000: 18. Apple A8X vs Apple A12 Bionic: 19. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 Hızlıbir hafıza (RAM) sonucu çok fazla etkileyecektir. Tek çekirdekli test, sadece bir CPU çekirdeği kullanır, çekirdek veya hyperthreading yeteneği sayılmaz. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. 8C 8T @ 2.84 GHz. 724 (65%) Apple A12 Bionic. 6C 6T @ 2.49 GHz. AppleA11 vs Snapdragon 855+ Speed test Update ; 주제에 대한 새로운 정보 a11 bionic 성능; a11 bionic 성능주제 안의 멋진 사진을 볼 수 있습니다; A11도 실성능->벤치성능 그대로 다 나오는건 아닙니다. – 시디피 Update New . Batalla PROCESADORES Apple, A14 vs A13 vs A12 vs A11 vs A10 vs A9 🔥 AppleA12 Bionic Snapdragon 855; własność: Apple A12 Bionic: Snapdragon 855: Proces projektowania: 7nm: 7nm: Architektura: 64-bit: 64-bit: procesor: 6-rdzeniowy procesor (2x rdzenie wydajności + 4x rdzenie wydajności) 8 procesorów Kryo 485 taktowanych do 2, 84 GHz: GPU: 4-rdzeniowy procesor graficzny zaprojektowany przez Apple: Adreno 640 我们比较了两个手机CPU处理器苹果 A12 Bionic和高通 骁龙 855 Plus。目前苹果 A12 Bionic在CPU天梯排行榜中，综合得分69，而高通 骁龙 855 Plus综合得分是66。通过对比两个CPU在AnTuTu和Geekbench等基准测试中跑分差异，和两个CPU芯片基本参数和技术规格，可以得出以 Theperformance of the mobile phone mainly depends on whether there is a good processor. With the increasing development of the smartphones, the smartphone chip also keeps update. This year (2019) three famous manufacturer from Huawei, Apple and Qualcomm released their latest processor - Kirin 990, Apple A13 Bionic and Snapdragon 855 Plus. . Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Apple A12 Bionic ► remove from comparisonThe Apple A12 Bionic is a System on a Chip SoC from Apple that is found in the iPhone Xs and Xr. It was announced late 2018 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores and four power efficiency cores. Compared to the previous A11 Bionic, the A12 should offer a 15% improved CPU performance for the performance cores and a 50% lower power consumption for the efficiency cores both according to Apple. The chip also includes a new GPU that is advertised as 50% faster, the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second. With billion transistors, the A12 Bionic is a big chip especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 3 Billion or a Skylake desktop quad-core Soc Billion. Compared to the A11, the A12 integrates 60% more Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus 855+ Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in 2019. Compared to the normal Snapdragon 855, the 855 Plus offers higher clock speeds of the GPU and CPU. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz up from GHz in the 855 and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. As the SD855, the 855+ integrates an Adreno 640 graphics card that is now higher clocked and should offer a 15% higher performance. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855+ at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The higher Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units ALUs than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power TDP of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around W under load. BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855+ ...Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus...Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 27400 avg 27548 median 27547 23% max 27717 Points min 30069 avg 34737 median 32129 27% max 42240 Points min 20636 avg 32923 median 31198 26% max 45072 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2723 avg 3064 median 3056 38% max 3347 Points min 3137 avg 4371 median 4659 58% max 4737 Points min 1934 avg 3937 median 4112 52% max 5024 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2880 avg 3129 median 2961 42% max 3493 Points min 3143 avg 4323 median 65% max 4725 Points min 2345 avg 3892 median 58% max 4703 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1116 avg 1118 median 48% max 1119 Points min 738 avg 751 median 751 32% max 764 Points min 552 avg 713 median 744 32% max 751 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2772 avg 2815 median 10% max 2857 Points min 2652 avg 2659 median 9% max 2665 Points min 2164 avg 2622 median 2694 9% max 2856 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 761 avg 782 median 3% max 792 Points min 725 avg 742 median 742 3% max 750 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2519 avg 2788 median 9% max 2940 Points min 2441 avg 2616 median 8% max 2852 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 4750 avg 4779 median 4774 49% max 4824 Points min 3603 avg 3654 median 3654 38% max 3705 Points min 3406 avg 3480 median 3491 36% max 3537 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 11244 avg 11418 median 11480 13% max 11598 Points min 9705 avg 10547 median 12% max 11388 Points min 10187 avg 10955 median 12% max 11388 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3295 avg 3548 median 3548 51% max 3801 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10163 avg 10529 median 10529 26% max 10895 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1658 avg 1926 median 1926 16% max 2194 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 3919 avg 4247 median 4247 39% max 4575 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11986 avg 14903 median 29% max 17819 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5470 avg 6620 median 13% max 7769 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7059 avg 8575 median 22% max 10090 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 603 avg 627 median 1% max 653 ms min 2007 avg 2054 median 2032 2% max 2134 ms min 1852 avg 2147 median 2114 2% max 2611 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 41367 avg 42312 median 40% max 43280 Points min 23781 avg 24606 median 24571 23% max 25353 Points min 17011 avg 23240 median 23937 23% max 25640 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 155 avg median 37% max 166 Points min 89 avg median 98 23% max 111 Points min 90 avg median 25% max 129 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 239512 avg 255436 median 255924 87% max 268271 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 7312 avg 9998 median 31% max 12409 Points min 9188 avg 13484 median 13816 42% max 19329 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 59570 avg 65177 median 66701 82% max 67735 Points min 53266 avg 73247 median 74726 92% max 79058 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 129473 avg 147840 median 151931 47% max 158023 Points min 67537 avg 152512 median 156467 49% max 191221 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 106600 avg 124761 median 127986 78% max 136472 Points min 85969 avg 115207 median 118475 73% max 127208 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 302955 avg 347775 median 358800 63% max 370545 Points min 217967 avg 354450 median 368232 65% max 398720 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 71574 avg 71607 median 60% max 71639 Points min 66276 avg 72044 median 71855 60% max 78191 Points min 51228 avg 63930 median 64229 54% max 72343 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 45962 avg 56767 median 56767 46% max 67572 Points min 64026 avg 80567 median 67% max 92659 Points min 52596 avg 61638 median 59373 48% max 75544 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 166588 avg 170290 median 170290 31% max 173992 Points min 169591 avg 184179 median 184036 34% max 199051 Points min 158097 avg 167704 median 167146 31% max 175532 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 98561 avg 122385 median 122385 44% max 146209 Points min 132673 avg 139174 median 139170 50% max 145684 Points min 114777 avg 135173 median 139365 50% max 140166 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 411764 avg 421049 median 421048 41% max 430333 Points min 462125 avg 478464 median 474972 46% max 501784 Points min 376698 avg 428445 median 432658 42% max 451559 Points Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total ScoreAntutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPUPassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 482773 avg 486852 median 486197 64% max 491585 Points min 237506 avg 249793 median 249792 33% max 262079 Points min 197214 avg 236383 median 246456 32% max 265478 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 6325 avg 7543 median 7424 39% max 8880 Points min 5121 avg 6872 median 33% max 12391 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 13484 avg 15895 median 34% max 18305 Points min 5578 avg 11793 median 11067 24% max 18491 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 8702 avg 10315 median 68% max 11690 Points min 8342 avg 9710 median 9664 63% max 11440 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 10286 avg 13201 median 12786 64% max 15510 Points min 10330 avg 12161 median 11890 59% max 14439 Points Average Benchmarks Apple A12 Bionic → 100% n=23Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus → 102% n=23Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 96% n=23 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 13. 1445420 checking url part for id 10166 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 11491 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10166 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 10166 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11491 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 11491 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11011 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 17 return log +0s ...